CRE Marketing: Build your Brand or Chase Leads?
In a rare debate, Josh argues for chasing deals while Dylan argues for building brand equity, landing on a hybrid: prioritize deals, but keep investing in brand.
Deals are tangible and pay the bills immediately, but relying solely on deal-chasing is a riskier long-term strategy.
Brands that build meaningful equity generate roughly three times the sales volume of weaker brands in their category.
78% of B2B buyers in the assessment phase will choose a vendor they've already heard of over an unknown one.
Brand-building doesn't require a huge budget—consistent visibility and reputation-building can happen through everyday marketing.
A hybrid approach works best: roughly 70% effort on deal-driving activities, 30% on longer-term brand equity, adjusted based on company size and stability.
Both matter, but the right balance depends on company size; a common rule of thumb is roughly 70% of effort on immediate deal-driving activities and 30% on longer-term brand equity.
Yes, brands with meaningful equity generate roughly three times the sales volume of weaker competing brands in the same category, according to industry research.
Around 78% of B2B buyers in the assessment phase choose a vendor they've already heard of over an unknown competitor, making brand recognition a real competitive advantage even before a conversation starts.
Not necessarily; consistent visibility and reputation-building can happen without a large advertising budget, though it does require sustained time and effort over multiple years.
Yes, relying solely on deal flow is a riskier long-term strategy, especially during economic downturns, compared to firms that have also built durable brand equity.
It offers a shortcut to established brand trust and national reach, though it typically comes with less independence than building a standalone brand from scratch.
Sign up for practical CRE marketing insights, tools and updates from our team. No fluff, no spam, just useful thinking to help you market smarter.